Daz 3D is part of 
Connect
DAZ Productions, Inc.
7533 S Center View Ct #4664
West Jordan, UT 84084
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2024 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Comments
Special kind of "dead". :lol:
They can still do stuff.
Thomas and Martha Wayne then, Batman's parents. Still dead. And they don't do stuff.
Special kind of "dead". :lol:
They can still do stuff.
Thomas and Martha Wayne then, Batman's parents. Still dead. And they don't do stuff.
Killed off in first issue of Origin Story - see also Uncle Ben - is another special kind of dead. They are allowed to stay dead permanently, barring the inevitable periodic reboot, in which case they miraculously are alive again only to be killed again, again.
Thomas and Martha Wayne then, Batman's parents. Still dead. And they don't do stuff.
Killed off in first issue of Origin Story - see also Uncle Ben - is another special kind of dead. They are allowed to stay dead permanently, barring the inevitable periodic reboot, in which case they miraculously are alive again only to be killed again, again.
tell that to "Composite Superman"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dead_comic_book_characters
Special kind of "dead". :lol:
They can still do stuff.
Thomas and Martha Wayne then, Batman's parents. Still dead. And they don't do stuff.
Not heroes, though. I should perhaps have been more specific. :)
Super-heroes and Super-villains can always come back. Witness the reset of the Spider-man goes public with his identity story-arc.
We non- heroic regular mortals can die because no one reads the comic book just for us.
Before you mention Jimmy Olsen and Lois Lane Comics, remember that Supes would invariably show up in the story somewhere.
And the number of angels that can fit on the head of a pin is 42. :)
Special kind of "dead". :lol:
They can still do stuff.
Thomas and Martha Wayne then, Batman's parents. Still dead. And they don't do stuff.
Before The New 52, wasn't there a current Flash storyline with Thomas Wayne?
Yeah, it was an alternate timeline. But since it was pivotal to the current incarnation of the DC universe, it doesn't fall into an Elseworld category.
As it is difficult to assume the size of angels, we might as well say their size approaches zero. Hence the maximum number of angels on a pins head will approach infinity.
As it is difficult to assume the size of angels, we might as well say their size approaches zero. Hence the maximum number of angels on a pins head will approach infinity.
(Looks it up again in the Hitch-Hiker's Guide) Nope the answer is still 42. :)
Thomas and Martha Wayne then, Batman's parents. Still dead. And they don't do stuff.
Not heroes, though. I should perhaps have been more specific. :)
Super-heroes and Super-villains can always come back. Witness the reset of the Spider-man goes public with his identity story-arc.
We non- heroic regular mortals can die because no one reads the comic book just for us.
Before you mention Jimmy Olsen and Lois Lane Comics, remember that Supes would invariably show up in the story somewhere.
And the number of angels that can fit on the head of a pin is 42. :)Very True.
And as for all the Jimmy's & Lois's, they're "sidekicks" which count as quasi-heroes--or damselles--or both....they can be killed, but only if the main-story arc requires it, and can even be brought back to life, again only if the main story arc needs it....Look @ Captain America's Bucky ;)
As it is difficult to assume the size of angels, we might as well say their size approaches zero. Hence the maximum number of angels on a pins head will approach infinity.
I believe the original debate was not about the head of a pin, as we use the term, but rather the point - could more than one angel occupy a single point in space, remembering that the modern concept of the granularity of reality was absent, or was that logically impossible?
I believe the original debate was not about the head of a pin, as we use the term, but rather the point - could more than one angel occupy a single point in space, remembering that the modern concept of the granularity of reality was absent, or was that logically impossible?
Head. Medieval in origin, and seriously debated at the time. Oy! 8-o
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_many_angels_can_dance_on_the_head_of_a_pin?
But the phrase has come to represent absurd musings and house-of-cards logic based on unfounded conjecture. Thus it's relevance in this thread.
I kind of feel like you could pretty much debate endlessly about anything that happens in comics, especially the Marvel and DC 'verses, because every time there is a continuity reboot they tweak things at least a little and sometimes change all the rules, modify the stories to fit the times, etc.
I believe the original debate was not about the head of a pin, as we use the term, but rather the point - could more than one angel occupy a single point in space, remembering that the modern concept of the granularity of reality was absent, or was that logically impossible?
Head. Medieval in origin, and seriously debated at the time. Oy! 8-o
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_many_angels_can_dance_on_the_head_of_a_pin?
But the phrase has come to represent absurd musings and house-of-cards logic based on unfounded conjecture. Thus it's relevance in this thread.
That appears to say point in most instances.
Head. Medieval in origin, and seriously debated at the time. Oy! 8-o
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_many_angels_can_dance_on_the_head_of_a_pin?
But the phrase has come to represent absurd musings and house-of-cards logic based on unfounded conjecture. Thus it's relevance in this thread.
That appears to say point in most instances.
That will teach me to read more than the first paragraph of a Google search. And despite my ancient age I apparently consider anything earlier than the Pilgrims to be the Middle Ages. And being less and less acute of vision, the distinction between "head" and "point" of a pin are lost on me unless you stab me with it. (*ouch*). Thank you sir, may I have another?
And for those of you who think that my replies in this thread are fully intended to be solidly absolute and unimpeachable then you're missing the thrust of this thread. 8-s
...hmmm maybe in a vat of Kryptonite Jell-O™. :cheese:
...and lat I heard, Lexcorp™ has been contemplating a buyout of Kraft™ foods.
as long as they don't mess with the Mac&Cheese; I don't care what they put in the lime jello
as long as they don't mess with the Mac&Cheese; I don't care what they put in the lime jello
I'm not convinced that jello is actually dead.
I'm not convinced that jello is actually dead.
Must be Jello, cause Jam don't jiggle like that!:cheese: