Loading...
> >

Serendipitous Mix and Match

DWGDWG Posts: 770
edited June 2012 in The Commons

I was just testing out some new purchases, and a handful from Christmas that got lost in the wrong folder.

First up was Chablis, who is absolutely beautiful in her own right and a purchase I'm definitely pleased with (particularly as it's nice to find a black character amongst the overwhelmingly white releases). To add to the attraction the V4 version is just as pretty. She's on sale right now at a bargain price: http://www.daz3d.com/shop/chablis-for-genesis-v4/

Next up for testing was Princess, one of the Christmas purchases that went astray (and the store search can't seem to find her at the minute, so she's really astray - but can be found here: http://www.daz3d.com/shop/princess/ again at a great price). Princess is a Thorne and Sarsa product, I like their skins, but I'm not a fan of the big-eyed look, so I normally tweak their morphs, but as I was just checking the install I simply dumped the MAT on top of Chablis, and through pure serendipity got this stunner. Given she's wearing the Aussie Girl outfit (and V5 Elite Ponytail), I've no hesitation in labelling her a right little beaut!

It's a useful reminder that textures and morphs don't have to stay in the pairings we buy them in.


*edited by mod to remove nudity* http://www.daz3d.com/forums/discussion/6_98/

Genesis_Princess_Chablis_Face.jpg
502 x 602 - 46K
Post edited by adamr001 on

Comments

  • DWGDWG Posts: 770
    edited December 1969

    *edited by mod to remove nudity*

    ?!

    As far as I was aware there was no nudity in the image - which was a full body shot of the character wearing the Aussie Girl top and shorts. Aussie Girl's top is slightly translucent, but I certainly wouldn't have considered it to breach the guidelines using any normal definition of nudity. I can only presume someone took issue with the breasts, but Aussie Girl covers them completely, as can be seen from the neckline in the remaining image, so I'm puzzled.

    I'm not quibbling with DAZ's right to decide what to show, but I really think they may need to work on the TOS wording to clarify what counts as nudity and what doesn't, because there are DAZ outfits that are far more revealing than Aussie Girl and it didn't occur to me for a moment that this might breach TOS - and in fact I'm still puzzled as to what precisely the problem was.

  • Richard HaseltineRichard Haseltine Posts: 100,546
    edited December 1969

    The nipples appeared to be visible through the shirt, in the absence of flags we are having to be stricter (usually we could just add a flag to any slightly borderline image and be done with it without greatly harming the thread).

Sign In or Register to comment.