Loading...
> >

Released: ShapesInjector [Commercial]

2»

Comments

  • TotteTotte Posts: 13,523
    edited October 2022

    Did a quick test, this was what you tried to do?

    screen.png
    932 x 716 - 148K
    Post edited by Totte on
  • bohemian3bohemian3 Posts: 1,030
    edited October 2022

    Don't know how I missed this.

    Wow... I was playing around with a script to do this very thing - Does it work with default JCMs as well overriding the 'vitual' JCM DAZ creates as long as they are named properly? 

    I literally have 20-30 morphs to load for clothing and this would save so much time !!!  

    For example these are the JCMs I create all the time.

    pJCMAbdomenFwd_35
    pJCMShldrDown_40_L
    pJCMShldrDown_40_R
    pJCMShldrFwd_110_L
    pJCMShldrFwd_110_R
    pJCMShldrUp_90_L
    pJCMShldrUp_90_R
    pJCMThighBack_35_L
    pJCMThighBack_35_R
    pJCMThighFwd_115_L
    pJCMThighFwd_115_R
    pJCMThighFwd_115_L
    pJCMThighFwd_115_R
    pJCMThighFwd_57_L
    pJCMThighFwd_57_R
    pJCMThighSide_85_L
    pJCMThighSide_85_R

    I think the challenge is to load these, the character has to be posed for the deltas - adding a step to the script to apply a single specific pose (like Thigh side) is what I was working on, then returning it to the A pose for next JCM.  Hmm maybe another product if this can't do that.  Nonetheless, I will be getting this immediately.

    p.s. just read your reply above in a previous post to this question.  Will PM you.  

    Post edited by bohemian3 on
  • TimotheusTimotheus Posts: 238

    Thanks. And by the way, there was nothing in the DS log, just that the script loaded.

  • TimotheusTimotheus Posts: 238

    Totte said:

    Did a quick test, this was what you tried to do?

    Yes, exactly. 

     

  • TotteTotte Posts: 13,523
    edited October 2022

    Timotheus said:

    Totte said:

    Did a quick test, this was what you tried to do?

    Yes, exactly. 

     

    PM sent.

    Please report it if works and if not, what the log says.

    Post edited by Totte on
  • TimotheusTimotheus Posts: 238

    Totte said:

    Timotheus said:

    Totte said:

    Did a quick test, this was what you tried to do?

    Yes, exactly. 

     

    PM sent.

    Please report it if works and if not, what the log says.

    Thanks. Will do, but it will be a little while before I'll have the chance.

     

  • TimotheusTimotheus Posts: 238

    Thanks for that update. Seemed to do the trick, as I am now able to modify a configuration and save it.

    Tim

  • TotteTotte Posts: 13,523

    OK, I fire an update.
    The issue was (as I suspected), that a config file could be read and not properly closed in some circumstances (whcih prevent it from being replaced on Windows, not always, but sometimes).

     

  • TotteTotte Posts: 13,523

    OK, update submitted, will take a while as the QA queue is quite long at the moment.

  • TotteTotte Posts: 13,523

    Update ready in DIM for download.

  • galiengalien Posts: 136

    Thanks for fixing the bug with saving definition files.

    I may be misunderstanding how the script should work but I think that there is another bug that needs to be fixed.

    The screen shot shows what happens when I click on the "Verify Shapes on Figure" for a folder that contain 2 morphs with the filenames "fbmSina" and "fbm-Tatiana".  The prefix "fbm-" is in the definition file as an alternative spelling for a FBM, but it is being incorrectly parsed as "FBM-Tatiana".  I think that the code is seeing the "fbm" part and converting this to "FBM";  and then it thinks that it's work is done without checking the fourth character.  I have found that I can fix this by manually editing the definitions file so that "fbm" is below "fbm-" in the list.

      

    ShapesInjector.png
    659 x 541 - 30K
  • TotteTotte Posts: 13,523

    galien said:

    Thanks for fixing the bug with saving definition files.

    I may be misunderstanding how the script should work but I think that there is another bug that needs to be fixed.

    The screen shot shows what happens when I click on the "Verify Shapes on Figure" for a folder that contain 2 morphs with the filenames "fbmSina" and "fbm-Tatiana".  The prefix "fbm-" is in the definition file as an alternative spelling for a FBM, but it is being incorrectly parsed as "FBM-Tatiana".  I think that the code is seeing the "fbm" part and converting this to "FBM";  and then it thinks that it's work is done without checking the fourth character.  I have found that I can fix this by manually editing the definitions file so that "fbm" is below "fbm-" in the list.

      

    I take a look, but I guess you are right in the assumtion that it walks the list top down looking for prefixes. 

  • TotteTotte Posts: 13,523

    galien said:

    Thanks for fixing the bug with saving definition files.

    I may be misunderstanding how the script should work but I think that there is another bug that needs to be fixed.

    The screen shot shows what happens when I click on the "Verify Shapes on Figure" for a folder that contain 2 morphs with the filenames "fbmSina" and "fbm-Tatiana".  The prefix "fbm-" is in the definition file as an alternative spelling for a FBM, but it is being incorrectly parsed as "FBM-Tatiana".  I think that the code is seeing the "fbm" part and converting this to "FBM";  and then it thinks that it's work is done without checking the fourth character.  I have found that I can fix this by manually editing the definitions file so that "fbm" is below "fbm-" in the list.

      

    PM sent 

  • galiengalien Posts: 136

    Totte said:

    galien said:

    Thanks for fixing the bug with saving definition files.

    I may be misunderstanding how the script should work but I think that there is another bug that needs to be fixed.

    The screen shot shows what happens when I click on the "Verify Shapes on Figure" for a folder that contain 2 morphs with the filenames "fbmSina" and "fbm-Tatiana".  The prefix "fbm-" is in the definition file as an alternative spelling for a FBM, but it is being incorrectly parsed as "FBM-Tatiana".  I think that the code is seeing the "fbm" part and converting this to "FBM";  and then it thinks that it's work is done without checking the fourth character.  I have found that I can fix this by manually editing the definitions file so that "fbm" is below "fbm-" in the list.

      

    PM sent 

    Replied to your PM.

     

  • TotteTotte Posts: 13,523

    Another update to be sent to PASS for QA today.

  • TotteTotte Posts: 13,523

    Update now in DIM.

  • JonnyBravo2010JonnyBravo2010 Posts: 21

    Thank you for updating Shapes Injector. Genesis 9 support makes this tool more handy than ever before. Keep up the great work.

  • TotteTotte Posts: 13,523

    JonnyBravo2010 said:

    Thank you for updating Shapes Injector. Genesis 9 support makes this tool more handy than ever before. Keep up the great work.

    Thank you, I didn't know it was not working until someone told me ;-) 

     

Sign In or Register to comment.