How about some parity?

24

Comments

  • vrba79vrba79 Posts: 1,357
    edited January 2018

    Well going back to two has worked out the exact opposite way, for some customers. Hence the problem I'm experiencing. With Genesis 1, you could easil take Hitomi and still make a male character, that looked very similar in style. Fast forward to 2018. Sakura 8 looks fantastic, but she's useless to me without a guy pal, and the PAs are going "well there's no money in it", so those of us who want a comperable male character are at their mercy.

    Post edited by vrba79 on
  • Serene NightSerene Night Posts: 17,639
    edited January 2018

    I was always told the reason for the gender split was to make it easier for pas to make clothing.... presumably for women. I’ve never heard customers demanding a gender split to any significant degree.

    Post edited by Serene Night on
  • wolf359wolf359 Posts: 3,827

    Has it been 15 Days already??surprise
    Another "why less male content" thread.....so soon
    I understand there is a certain visceral satifaction
    in being able to post ones gripes.


    But certainly no one actually thinks that yet another
    rehash of this subject is going to change the paradigm.

    Users can Accept what clothing  is available or learn to model
    their own...or Dont buy anything at allwink

    As far as specific male counter parts of  specific female "characters",
     I dont understand why this is so important thus have no opinion
    on that issue.

  • vrba79 said:

    I think Daz3D had it right with Genesis 1. It was literally an all in one figure. Addons could be interchanged like never before. I'm sure there's some convoluted excuse that boils down to "because, money!" as for why they went back to dual figures with G2 and beyond.

    Genesis 2 Female and Male were separated because making natural looking clothes for the unisex Genesis was hard (as a look at the breasts on a lot of Genesis clothing will show).

  • vrba79 said:

    Well going back to two has worked out the exact opposite way, for some customers. Hence the problem I'm experiencing. With Genesis 1, you could easil take Hitomi and still make a male character, that looked very similar in style. Fast forward to 2018. Sakura 8 looks fantastic, but she's useless to me without a guy pal, and the PAs are going "well there's no money in it", so those of us who want a comperable male character are at their mercy.

    AutoFit will convert clothing, the Transfer Utility can convert moprhs. Every Genesis has had the ability to AutoFit/Transfer between the male and female figures.

  • vrba79vrba79 Posts: 1,357
    wolf359 said:

     

    As far as specific male counter parts of  specific female "characters",
     I dont understand why this is so important thus have no opinion
    on that issue.

    Okay. Gonna go with an extreme example to drive the point home. Lets say you are a comic artist. You go to make a scene with male and female characters. For your female you have Sakura 8, for your male Poser 4's Dork. Needless to say, they don't look right together, because they just don't match. The scene just doesn't work. Now, if you have say Aiko and Hiro 6, it looks right, because the characters look like they belong in the same style. This is very important for people who lack the skill to model their own.

  • evilded777evilded777 Posts: 2,464
    Oso3D said:

    If it’s a choice between your $10 and fifty people’s $10, my landlord demands I go with the fifty people.

    It’s not Daz. It’s not the PA.

    If you are going to be mad at anyone, be mad at the customer base. If you are going to change minds, change theirs.

    Or learn to do it yourself, become a PA, and show all the other content creators they are wrong.

    Sorry, Wil, no. This argument might have held some water at one time.  But see the two other comments like mine about the decline in quality of male products. They are not up to par.  That being said, their are of course the exceptions to the rule (malemedia always turns out a quality product, as do others).  I've never passed on a male bundle until some of the offerings for Genesis 8.

    Thing is he's not talking about quality, he's saying if there is a choice between male and female products when it's time to pay bills.. the female is always going to win because it sells more. I've said that that we have to work to support those that are trying to make make content and nurture them to continue... however there's been far too many threads that throw those vendors to the wolves rather then nurture them.. so at that point instead of asking for new content, just work with what you have. At this point you simply can't have it both ways; we're in no position of strength to demand anything. Either nurture or work with what you have.

    Note that I'm sure someone will say I don't have to pay for what I don't want.. yeah, but there's a saying that beggars can't be choosers. That's where we that consume male content are. Either we work to get them up to the point they're making the quality content or we just either convert what we already have or make our own content.

    Right, you make what seems like a valid point. All reasonable like, too.  Except what I have seen is backwards movement. I'm not throwing anyone to the wolves, I am being honest when I say that.  Particularly in the bundles I have seen of late, the work on display is by artists who have been around the block (doing clothes for Genesis 2 Male) and they haven't improved IMO and I have been paying attention, I did reviews for over a year of ongoing releases.

    I'm trying to be careful here because my sentiments have been frowned upon and frankly I think they ought to be seen because I am not alone. There are artists on sale here and elsewhere who produce products that put the bundled products in really, really bad light. I get it... if they prefer not to sell their products to DAZ for inclusion in a bundle or for Platinum, they don't have to. But DAZ ought to be looking at what they are getting (and then selling to us) compared to what others are producing and recognize and do something about the gap in quality and performance.

    Again, if the methods being employed to not nurture artists starting out end up in the situation now, who gets the blame? Those PAs simply go back to what they know and the disparity widens, and these threads continue. I just threw the idea out there, because if I need to i have the tools to do what i want without the intention of putting them on the market and sparing myself the headache. It is what it is at the end of the day and people have to work for positive solutions not negative ones, especially when a group is affected by the disparity.

    There's no "solution" because there will always be unhappy customers.  There will never be parity because of the economics involved.

    But we can hope for value for the money we spend. And of late I am not seeing that. i have perhaps made some snap judgements based on previous experiences, and made judgements more on my own perceived usefulness of the articles on offer, but when compared to the things I will buy (that are very often in the same price range), I don't see the value. That, to me, is where the argument lies: percieved usefulness (and percieved sophistication of modeling/textures) and attractivness vs cost.

  • There's no "solution" because there will always be unhappy customers.  There will never be parity because of the economics involved.

    I agree with the first part, as far as the unhappy customers goes, but not the second. I do not agree with the second part simply because I believe the customer is as much a part of the solution as the PAs are.

  • evilded777evilded777 Posts: 2,464

    There's no "solution" because there will always be unhappy customers.  There will never be parity because of the economics involved.

    I agree with the first part, as far as the unhappy customers goes, but not the second. I do not agree with the second part simply because I believe the customer is as much a part of the solution as the PAs are.

    And what, do we as customers, do in this ongoing situation? There certainly is more male content released regularly (though if its not a character release, its a trickle), but it does not seem to be what those of us who want male content want to buy. How do we address this other than speaking with our wallets, which amounts to silence and a downward spiral?

     

  • wolf359wolf359 Posts: 3,827
    edited January 2018

    "Okay. Gonna go with an extreme example to drive the point
     home. Lets say you are a comic artist. You go to make a scene
     with male and female characters. For your female you have 
    Sakura 8, for your male Poser 4's Dork. Needless to say, they 
    don't look right together, 
    because they just don't match. The scene just doesn't work."

    This makes Zero sense.
     Anyone using Sakura 8 for G8,
    in a comic ,would  likely be using at least DS 4.9
    thus would  not even be considering a 25 year old figure like Poser4 "Dork" .

    Post edited by wolf359 on
  • wolf359 said:

    "Okay. Gonna go with an extreme example to drive the point
     home. Lets say you are a comic artist. You go to make a scene
     with male and female characters. For your female you have 
    Sakura 8, for your male Poser 4's Dork. Needless to say, they 
    don't look right together, 
    because they just don't match. The scene just doesn't work."

    This makes Zero sense.
     Anyone using Sakura 8 for G8,
    in a comic ,would  likely be using at least DS 4.9
    thus would  not even be considering a 25 year old figure like Poser4 "Dork" .

    I think the example, while a bit extreme, makes the point that using Dork would be as visually jarring as using some other more recent character instead of one that is visually compatible stylistically.

  • There's no "solution" because there will always be unhappy customers.  There will never be parity because of the economics involved.

    I agree with the first part, as far as the unhappy customers goes, but not the second. I do not agree with the second part simply because I believe the customer is as much a part of the solution as the PAs are.

    And what, do we as customers, do in this ongoing situation? There certainly is more male content released regularly (though if its not a character release, its a trickle), but it does not seem to be what those of us who want male content want to buy. How do we address this other than speaking with our wallets, which amounts to silence and a downward spiral?

     

    So, speaking anecdotally because I have not seen other data that DAZ can see, or learn through experience as the PAs have...

    I feel like I buy a good amount of male things when available--hair, characters, poses, weapons, etc. But, I hold back in terms of clothing, especially anything with weird-looking pants. If we can get some good dforce pants, or just decent-looking, non-body-hugging pants, I personally would be buying more male clothing. So many times I put male clothing in my cart, only to dump it after a closer look on the pants.

  • Serene NightSerene Night Posts: 17,639
    edited January 2018

    perhap start a thread about making a  opposite counterpart out of morphs There are several forum members who seem failrly accomplished at making morphs work and might provide some tips. 

    Post edited by Serene Night on
  • Oso3DOso3D Posts: 15,008
    edited January 2018

    The thing is, even if you think all male content stinks now, all the commentary being made now has been made since Genesis 2 (and probably longer).

    If there was a point where you thought the content was great, it was made less frequently and PAs observed that it mostly sold worse.

    If you think some male content is good and the rest is drek, if that content sold fantastically, PAs would notice.

     

    So, basically, the overall quality you perceive doesn’t seem to be making a difference.

    Post edited by Oso3D on
  • Oso3DOso3D Posts: 15,008

    I liked having one figure with Genesis, but there are definite upsides to splitting it.

    Thankfully there are loads of cross gender morphs and such, so it’s not so hard to synergize.

  • evilded777evilded777 Posts: 2,464
    Oso3D said:

    The thing is, even if you think all male content stinks now, all the commentary being made now has been made since Genesis 2 (and probably longer).

    If there was a point where you thought the content was great, it was made less frequently and PAs observed that it mostly sold worse.

    If you think some male content is good and the rest is drek, if that content sold fantastically, PAs would notice.

     

    So, basically, the overall quality you perceive doesn’t seem to be making a difference.

    It makes a difference in what I will spend my money on and I can only comment on my perceptions because they are the only ones I am privy to. That being said, I've been at this a while and trust my perceptions. Past experience has also taught me what vendors are a safe bet and which ones are not. Unfortunately, the good bets are generally not on offer in a male bundle. And that little fact is a bit of a coup de grace in many cases.

  • nonesuch00nonesuch00 Posts: 18,107

    Well I liked Genesis male / female better as one base figure theorectically too but for the characters I do have of Genesis, the bending and distortions around the posed bones bends and morphed areas can be quite awful looking. I don't know how with less polygons Genesis 8 looks so much better but it does maybe it is that weightmapping is better than it used to be.

    As far as these complaint threads there have been some really surprisingly cardboard tube looking ad copy for some new Genesis 8 clothing but I really can't say if it's worse or not as I haven't bought it.

    I have had consistant problems in certain areas of fit for male and female clothing for too much clothing for Genesis 3 onward which was when I 1st started using 'DAZ' expensively. In my mind, these clothing fitting problems have got to go, to ever progress to much more than a skin-of-the-teeth income for most DAZ PAs. Keep calling DAZ 3D model products a bargain all you want but a hobbyist customer for fun or hobbyists speculating on their own art commisions, games, animations, graphic novels, and what not with their spare money and spare time are not the same target market as AAA game studios with a staff of 3D artists creating bespoke designs, models, and art so to and make those markets some sort of competitive equivalents is not going to fly. A hobbyist has to produce a much better story than a big AAA game company has too to even get noticed to make a dent in sales.

    Anyway, when I think of male or female clothing there isn't really a lot lacking, especially when you take autofit into consideration. In Genesis 3 there was even 2 police / security uniform sets and firefighter uniforms and construction uniforms which although made for the males, autofit on the females and in real life also worn by females. And those cases were big improvements over the earlier offerings of those style work uniforms too. There is also the plain jane every day clothing, male & female. 

    I'm afraid beside a male fairy & male anime to match the Sakura / Karyssa I don't have much to complain about besides auto-fit failing too much and a couple of DAZ Studio bugs I've already submitted.

    I'd like to see dForce fit and drape make autofit a thing of the past but I guess I'll have to be patient on that.

  • wolf359wolf359 Posts: 3,827
    wolf359 said:

    "Okay. Gonna go with an extreme example to drive the point
     home. Lets say you are a comic artist. You go to make a scene
     with male and female characters. For your female you have 
    Sakura 8, for your male Poser 4's Dork. Needless to say, they 
    don't look right together, 
    because they just don't match. The scene just doesn't work."

    This makes Zero sense.
     Anyone using Sakura 8 for G8,
    in a comic ,would  likely be using at least DS 4.9
    thus would  not even be considering a 25 year old figure like Poser4 "Dork" .

    I think the example, while a bit extreme, makes the point that using Dork would be as visually jarring as using some other more recent character instead of one that is visually compatible stylistically.

    Stylisticly there have been "anime" style males in recent years
    that are certainly more recent  than poser 4 era males.
    Perhaps an anime comic illustrator should consider GENX 2 or other methods 
    for Creating males to match certain Female Genre's
    There are options in DS ...Do the Bloody work  to achieve your creative objectives wink

  • Conclusion: DAZ should be more aware and make an effort to at least always release on store the same toon/Sakura/fairy  unique styles on both male/female, and help PAs to build better male trousers. I think these things are the minimun improvement on parity without costing that much.

  • EquisVoid said:

    Conclusion: DAZ should be more aware and make an effort to at least always release on store the same toon/Sakura/fairy  unique styles on both male/female, and help PAs to build better male trousers. I think these things are the minimun improvement on parity without costing that much.

    What if the PA that creates the toon or whatever isn't interested in doing a male and neither are the other PAs? I think that's often the reason you don't see a male counterpart.
  • nonesuch00nonesuch00 Posts: 18,107
    edited January 2018
    EquisVoid said:

    Conclusion: DAZ should be more aware and make an effort to at least always release on store the same toon/Sakura/fairy  unique styles on both male/female, and help PAs to build better male trousers. I think these things are the minimun improvement on parity without costing that much.

     

    What if the PA that creates the toon or whatever isn't interested in doing a male and neither are the other PAs? I think that's often the reason you don't see a male counterpart.

    Well the claim is usually made in these threads that they would make such characters but customers aren't buying. Anyway, it's like manufacturing a washer but not a dryer.

    As far as females outselling males by a wide margin I believe that easily but I don't believe all those slight variations of female unpracticable fashion clothing and female unpracticle fashion armour's sales could be that good. I look for good original practical female clothing and it's not much more on offer than good original practical male clothing. 

    Post edited by nonesuch00 on
  • Tanis VoltaTanis Volta Posts: 550
    edited January 2018

     

    EquisVoid said:

    Conclusion: DAZ should be more aware and make an effort to at least always release on store the same toon/Sakura/fairy  unique styles on both male/female, and help PAs to build better male trousers. I think these things are the minimun improvement on parity without costing that much.

     

    What if the PA that creates the toon or whatever isn't interested in doing a male and neither are the other PAs? I think that's often the reason you don't see a male counterpart.

    That's not an excuse, DAZ is able to motivate PAs to produce costly things for PC and even to give away as free gift on March Madness and Christmas, I dont see why DAZ can't do the same and motivate PAs with $$ to make two bundles or three per year of toon/fairy/sakura males and Mobius females. That's the only way.

    Post edited by Tanis Volta on
  • EquisVoid said:

     

    EquisVoid said:

    Conclusion: DAZ should be more aware and make an effort to at least always release on store the same toon/Sakura/fairy  unique styles on both male/female, and help PAs to build better male trousers. I think these things are the minimun improvement on parity without costing that much.

     

    What if the PA that creates the toon or whatever isn't interested in doing a male and neither are the other PAs? I think that's often the reason you don't see a male counterpart.

    That's not an excuse, DAZ is able to motivate PAs to produce costly things for PC and even to give away as free gift on March Madness and Christmas, I dont see why DAZ can't do the same and motivate PAs with $$ to make two bundles or three per year of toon/fairy/sakura males and Mobius females. That's the only way.

    You don't have to motivate someone that wants to do something to begin with, and you can't expect the same quality from someone that's not wanting to do something as you should.
  • nonesuch00nonesuch00 Posts: 18,107
    edited January 2018

    Anybody that's worked the same job a long time often gets bored with the job but their desire for quality and respect for self, coworkers, employer, and customers motivates them to create quality despite their boredom and maybe low-pay. Yes, some of you that have chosen the world of  exactly what type of job you want and even the type of products you make at your job to make a living might be surprised to find that people like myself have worked as busboys and many other 'menial low-paying' jobs that were the only jobs available and only way to obtain money too but we still make sure to do a good job anyway out of self-respect, respect for coworks, respect for the business, and respect for the customers. It's not 'selling out' to make a living at a legal job that is the only available while still be good at the job and respectful and helpful to coworkers and customers.

    Post edited by nonesuch00 on
  • k410k410 Posts: 75
    edited January 2018

    I'm primarily interested in male characters, and I haven't felt hindered by content so far (I started with Daz Studio in summer of 2017). But then I'm not interested in anime/manga style characters. I have a very slight interest in catguys (meowy yaoi?) but I couldn't guarantee anyone a sale in that area.

    BTW, I appreciate the comments about economics and motivations.

    Post edited by k410 on
  • wolf359 said:

    Stylisticly there have been "anime" style males in recent years
    that are certainly more recent  than poser 4 era males.
    Perhaps an anime comic illustrator should consider GENX 2 or other methods 
    for Creating males to match certain Female Genre's
    There are options in DS ...Do the Bloody work  to achieve your creative objectives wink

    Respectfully, I don't think "do it yourself" is an appropriate or relevant response to suggestions in a product suggestions forum.

    In addition, most/many people have done work in attempting to achieve their creative objectives. But to act like everyone has the capability or time--I mean, isn't a main selling point of DAZ and its products the fact that it makes people's lives easier in achieving their creative objectives?

    Not having male counterparts for stylistic characters is just weird to me. Even if it doesn't sell well, having it available adds value to the female character (i.e., can be used by people who want to actually make anime-styled stories that include both female and male characters), and can attract additional customers.

    I just tried to get a friend of mine to consider selling his creations to DAZ last night (he's selling to Unity and Turbosquid). He visited the store and he initially thought DAZ was primarily used for making skimpily-dressed girls and women and wondered if his creatures would even have a place here. He's probably not the only person who gets that impression and leaves (although I'm trying to convince him otherwise). So, while this is just anecdotal, I do think more parity can attract a broader base and increase sales over time.  

  • vrba79vrba79 Posts: 1,357

    "Respectfully, I don't think "do it yourself" is an appropriate or relevant response to suggestions in a product suggestions forum."

    Amen.

  • wolf359wolf359 Posts: 3,827
    edited January 2018
    ......
    Post edited by wolf359 on
  • wolf359wolf359 Posts: 3,827

    Anyway, it's like manufacturing a washer but not a dryer.

     

     

     

    A poor analogy...Most people buying a  modern utility like a washer
    will naturally expect to be able to Dry the clothing with similar convenience
    or the utilitarian value of the automatic washer is somewhat diminished.

    In my opinion Female Characters in the DAZ  content market(of any style)
    obviously have their own intrinsic,stand alone value in the complete
    absence of a similarly styled male counter part.
    ( hence the higher sales and content support)

    I dont recall seeing any posts complaining that "Bethany 7"
    Did  not have male counter part with a BMI that "exceed the Ideal".

    "Big girls" need mates too right ??

  • wolf359 said:

    In my opinion Female Characters in the DAZ  content market(of any style)
    obviously have their own intrinsic,stand alone value in the complete
    absence of a similarly styled male counter part.
    ( hence the higher sales and content support)

    Of course female characters have their own intrinsic, stand-alone value. I just think the value goes up if there is a male counterpart.

    wolf359 said:

    I dont recall seeing any posts complaining that "Bethany 7"
    Did  not have male counter part with a BMI that "exceed the Ideal".

    "Big girls" need mates too right ??

    I can't speak to this, as I was not active in the forums at that time, but I would absolutely want a male counterpart to Bethany. 

Sign In or Register to comment.